A Class 1 Misdemeanor Theft at Phoenix Municipal Court carried up to 180 days jail, civil restitution exposure, mandatory shoplifter education, and a permanent theft-related misdemeanor on the record. Future First got the case into diversion with one 8-hour class. The case dismissed within six weeks and the arrest record was sealed within four months.

At a glance

Court Phoenix Municipal Court
Original charge Theft (ARS § 13-1802), Class 1 Misdemeanor
Presumptive exposure Up to 180 days of jail under ARS § 13-707, a fine up to $2,500 plus 84 percent surcharges, supervised probation up to three years, civil restitution exposure under ARS § 12-691, mandatory shoplifter education, and a permanent theft-related misdemeanor on the client’s record. Theft-category convictions are especially damaging on background checks because most employer screens flag any theft offense regardless of dollar value
Result State agreed to Shoplifting/Theft Diversion Program; single 8-hour diversion class at $200; no additional fees; no restitution; case dismissed in full approximately six weeks after plea; arrest record sealing under ARS § 13-911 granted approximately three months after dismissal
Set aside under ARS § 13-905 Not needed (no conviction entered)
Eligibility for sealing Granted under ARS § 13-911, approximately four months after the original plea entry

The stakes

The client faced a Class 1 Misdemeanor Theft charge under ARS § 13-1802 in Phoenix Municipal Court. A C1M theft conviction would have meant up to 180 days of jail under ARS § 13-707, a fine up to $2,500 plus 84 percent surcharges, supervised probation up to three years, civil restitution exposure under ARS § 12-691, mandatory shoplifter education, and a permanent theft-related misdemeanor on the client’s record that surfaces on every employment, housing, professional licensing, and immigration background screen. Theft convictions are especially damaging because most employer background checks flag any theft-category offense regardless of dollar value.

What we did

Future First negotiated the case into the Shoplifting/Theft Diversion Program. The client completed a single 8-hour diversion class at $200, paid no additional fees and no restitution, and the case was dismissed in full approximately six weeks after the plea was entered. No conviction entered. No probation. No jail. Set aside under ARS § 13-905 not needed because no conviction was entered. Arrest record sealing under ARS § 13-911 was granted approximately three months after dismissal, fully clearing the record.

What our clients say

Future First Criminal Law has earned hundreds of five-star reviews from clients across Arizona. Read our verified Google reviews or see what past clients have said on our client reviews page.

If you’re facing theft charges in Arizona

Theft-category convictions on background checks affect employment opportunities for years. Retail employers, financial services firms, healthcare employers, and bonding agencies flag theft misdemeanors as disqualifiers regardless of how minor the underlying conduct was. The Phoenix Municipal Court Shoplifting/Theft Diversion Program is designed to close low-level theft cases without conviction, which avoids the long-tail employment problem entirely.

The full sequence on this case ran six weeks from plea to dismissal, then another three months from dismissal to sealing. Four months total from plea entry to a fully cleared record is among the fastest possible turnaround on a theft case in Arizona. The arrest record sealing under § 13-911 removes the case from public view going forward, which means background checks return clean.

Future First Criminal Law has handled theft cases across Maricopa County and Arizona. We know how Phoenix Municipal Court evaluates Shoplifting/Theft Diversion eligibility.

Related resources

Call us

Facing theft charges in Arizona? Call Future First Criminal Law at 602-932-7890 or request a free consultation. We have handled hundreds of Arizona theft cases. The earlier we are involved, the more options you have.


Anonymized in line with firm policy. Client name not used. Specific dates approximated to year only. Outcome described reflects this client’s actual results. Past outcomes do not guarantee future results. For more detailed information on Arizona criminal law, visit the Arizona State Legislature website.